First draft of an article
Independent filmmaking
At the end of
1980s, independent film got out of the wee “art houses” (specialized
theaters) of some big American cities and planted itself a prominent appearance
in society culture. Independent filmmakers see themselves as challenging the
domination of Hollywood, avoiding entertainment—fantasy, enjoyment, happy
endings—and instead suggesting abrupt and “edgy” narratives about life in
modern society. This article will discuss the origins, development and
importance of independent filmmaking . I will critically analyse differences
between studio films and independent films. I will look at examples of
Avant-Garde [1] cinema and
experimental film and discuss this in relation to independent filmmaking. At
the end of my article I will include ‘top 5 independent films to watch’ to
encourage people to watch independent films.
“Hollywood” as both
fantasy and material reality exercised control over the world of American
entertainment for the whole twentieth century. However from the beginning in
the backward of the industry, there were challenges to Hollywood
domination, with different trials to establish variable places of film-making
outside of the major studios. What does independent film mean? The easiest way
to start is to say that an independent film is defined—to different degrees and
in different ways—as the polarity of a Hollywood studio film. The importance of
independent filmmaking could be seen in a diversity of comparatively aimed
detectors. Where studio movies are very expensive, independent films are
produced on comparably low budgets; where studio movies are in the business of
“entertainment,” independent films frequently expound to challenge their
audience with comparatively complex topic or techniques or both; where
Hollywood films basically avoid being on someone’s side in politics,
independent films are oftentimes expressly political and critical; where
Hollywood films are in the occupation of fantasy and illusion, independent
films turn on actually all documentary movies, and even particular qualities
are commonly extremely realistic; and after all, where Hollywood films
classically have happy endings, independent films infrequently do it. For example, filmmaker Karen Moncrieff
(e.g., The Dead Girl said, “I’ m interested in movies that
make people feel something, and that’s what I gravitate toward. I like to be
pushed off my center when I go to the movies. I like to be invited to feel and
think” (Moncrieff n.d., circa 2006). Rodrigo García, in the interview discussed
earlier, made similar comments about “how a film needs to make demands on you,
and throw you off balance” (fieldnotes February 10, 2007).
Two warnings should
instantly be entered here. In the first place, all references to “Hollywood
films” should be understood as referring to the big-money-making films
that are the bread-and-butter of the Hollywood studios. I do not want to
suggest that Hollywood has never made a film with complex characters, or
innovative politics, or complex topics. However these films have always been in
the infancy within the summary Hollywood outcome, while they tend to be the
better part of independent films. Secondly, it should be understood that there
is a spectrum of what is seen as an independent film, with a more Hollywood-y
end of the spectrum and a more drastically avant-garde and experimental end.
For nowadays goals, however, I write as if there were a clear twin offset among
the two ideal types, and use the above text of true indie characteristics—low
budget, complex topic, multiple happy endings, et cetera—to afford some simple
regulations of thumb for differentiating an independent film (an “indie”) from
a “Hollywood” or “studio” film. Here is seven steps to developing an indie
movie: find the script (all films, regardless of the budget, start with a script);sort
your budget (once you have your story, figure out how much money it’ll
cost),hire your crew; get your cast; prep your shoot days; mind the
post-production; submit to film festivals (Masterclass,2021)
As an onwards help to portraying the indie object, I present here the Top 5 independent films to watch:
·
Mean Streets (1973)
·
Reservoir Dogs (1992)
·
Donnie Darko (2001)
·
The Terminator (1984)
·
Evil Dead II (1987)
Furthermore to
these feature (i.e., fiction) films, actually all experimental movies are
independent films. With unusual exclusions, Hollywood studios do not make
experimental films as an accomplishment mandate to entertain. Experimental and
avant-garde film the same as independent film is cinema made outside of the
film industry. They are on an artisanal ground, substantially without
attention to the structures and requirements of traditional narrative movies.
Whereas experimental film as a detached mode of movie practice is
international, its most extended demonstrations were in western Europe before
World War II and North America and Britain in the post-war period. Avant-garde
film is often made in the relation of the greater art world, especially in correlation
to the visual arts and literature. It is also oftentimes made as a critique of
predominant, classical Hollywood film and functions in context to political
movements and actions, such as feminism. Albeit experimental films present
multiplicity structures, lengths, and concerns, filmmakers have traditionally
preferred 8 mm and 16 mm formats. Presently, directors are using video and new
media of all prospects plus containing film in bigger multimedia settings.
Erudition and writing about experimental film run the scale from profoundly
private and inadvertent in tone to extremely tight and
conceptual.
In
conclusion, I would like to say that this article describes the
importance of independent filmmaking and clarifies the main points of
differences among studios and independent films. The first grade may be called
the grade of cultures and practice: independent filmmaking discern itself as
distinct from or better than Hollywood in its ethos and practices of making
movies, concretely in terms of the profitable conception of the studios and the
comparatively unprofitable conception of independent filmmaking. Another grade
concerns the nature of the movies themselves in the two worlds. Here is a
critique of the stereotypical Hollywood movie not only as informed foremost by
the profitable conception, however as well by a comparatively undoubted
attitude to the predominant or mainline culture. Research about Avant – Garde
and experimental films showed that most or all of them are independent films
and are filmed outside of the studio. Avant-garde filmmakers experimenting with
genres, they sometimes use the lack of film language ,they represent a new
reality that the audience happily greets, which always expects something
incredible from filmmakers. Overall, this has enabled me to deeply understand
the importance of developing independent cinematography.
References
Film theory (2014) ‘Avant-Garde’
[Online] Available at: www.filmtheory.org [Accessed:05.09.2021].
Nair, M. (2021) ‘How
to make an Independent Film: Step-by-Step Guide’. [Online] Available at: www.masterclass.com [Accessed:05.09.2021].
Nonetwork (2021) ‘What
is a non-linear narrative and how do you write one?’ [Online] Available at:
www.nofilmschool.com [Accessed:05.09.2021].
Stitney,P. (2002). ‘Visionary
film: the American avant-garde,1943-2000’. New York. Oxford: Oxford
university press.
Valentini, V.(2020) ‘24
of The Best Indie Movies of All Time’.[Online] Available at:
www.esquire.com [Accessed:05.09.2021].
[1]
Avant-Garde cinema this is kind of independent cinema and made outside of the
film industry. The films explore issues of time, space, dreams, fantasy, and
perception.
Comments
Post a Comment